26 February 2009
25 February 2009
A Star is Born (1937)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5952a/5952ae4bd505d55bbc9835d07015c1a9d0fccc76" alt=""
Janet Gaynor turns in a great performance as Esther, including one scene wherein she imitates Greta Garbo, Katharine Hepburn and Mae West in an attempt to get the studio big-shots to notice her at the party. She plays the role of the starry-eyed ingenue perfectly, which makes her all the more pathetic when she has to confront the true nature of the beast called Hollywood. One cannot help but feel for her when her rabid fans hound her for autographs, utterly indifferent to her suffering.
It's Fredric March, however, who ultimately steals the film--his depiction of Norman Maine is truly wonderful. Norman Maine is a character with whom I truly identify--a man who was once on top of the world, but finds solace only in drink now that that same world has left him behind. I can't help but think that I'll wind up like him one day. Having already seen him in Susan and God (1940), The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931), I have to say that Fredric March is easily one of my favorite actors (it's worth noting that he won oscars for the latter two pictures).
A Star is Born is also interesting because it gives a fairly accurate portrayal of the star-making process. Molding Esther Blodgett into Vicki Lester involves inventing a new life story for her (courtesy of the loathsome publicity agent Matt Libby, played by Lionel Stander, one of the better character actors of the day). It also means creating a whole new look for her, and Vicki is placed in the care of two make up artists who try to devise the perfect look for her ("Does she have to look surprised all the time?").
The story of A Star is Born is one that was told before--the 1932 film What Price Hollywood? is remarkably similar--and would be told again--in a 1954 remake--but the 1937 iteration is perhaps the best of the lot. It's definitely worth watching.
23 February 2009
21 February 2009
Great Ladykillers of Yesteryear: William Haines
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b95d6/b95d6e5760d9998be4aec170d1a222f2515bde79" alt=""
Yet despite being one of MGM's most likable players, Will's film career was quite suddenly cut short in 1933, when he was arrested during a tryst with another young man at the local YMCA. Although Haines was openly gay (and had been living with his lover for some time), MGM had kept the matter under the radar. In the wake of the incident, Louis B. Mayer insisted that Haines enter into a lavender marriage if he wished to keep his film career going. Being a man of principle, Haines refused and went on to live a long and happy life with Jimmy Shields. After leaving the motion picture business, Haines took up interior decorating with Shields. Many of Will's old friends from Hollywood were among their clients.
One more thing about Will Haines: the motherfucker had some good taste. If you don't believe me, have a look at some of his interior design work at William Haines Designs.
16 February 2009
Heroes and Such
Although it will no doubt cause a great deal of bewilderment among my peers, I'll say this anyway: I have only ever seen one James Bond film and I really have no desire to see any of the others. The problem is that James Bond (along with the dozens of other characters of the same ilk) is essentially a wish-fulfillment figure for the garden variety heterosexual male: he drives absurdly nice cars, employs a limitless arsenal of weapons and gadgets, is surrounded by an endless parade of beautiful women and is almost never defeated. The same can be said, by and large, of most other action heroes.
Such superhuman wish-fulfillment figures are rampant in the media. The past several years have seen one overblown superhero movie after the next, and Heroes is among the most popular shows on television. This is partly, I suspect, because comic book nerds are now adults to whom products can be more effectively (and therefore more profitably) marketed, but that still leaves unanswered the question as to why hero characters are so popular to begin with. As I understand it, hero characters are popular because they often represent ethical or moral convictions that are held by most people and can overcome whatever obstacles they might face--even death, in some cases, is a temporary setback.
Yet the insurmountability of the hero that makes me so averse to them. In other words, the problem is that he is simply too perfect. James Bond and his sort are not characters with whom I can sympathize or empathize in any meaningful way--I cannot identify with the action hero, largely because the action hero is neither the kind of person that I am, that I aspire to be nor that I realistically can aspire to be. More profoundly, my inability to relate to the human society of which I am inextricably a member naturally begets an inability to relate to the icons of that society.
Such superhuman wish-fulfillment figures are rampant in the media. The past several years have seen one overblown superhero movie after the next, and Heroes is among the most popular shows on television. This is partly, I suspect, because comic book nerds are now adults to whom products can be more effectively (and therefore more profitably) marketed, but that still leaves unanswered the question as to why hero characters are so popular to begin with. As I understand it, hero characters are popular because they often represent ethical or moral convictions that are held by most people and can overcome whatever obstacles they might face--even death, in some cases, is a temporary setback.
Yet the insurmountability of the hero that makes me so averse to them. In other words, the problem is that he is simply too perfect. James Bond and his sort are not characters with whom I can sympathize or empathize in any meaningful way--I cannot identify with the action hero, largely because the action hero is neither the kind of person that I am, that I aspire to be nor that I realistically can aspire to be. More profoundly, my inability to relate to the human society of which I am inextricably a member naturally begets an inability to relate to the icons of that society.
14 February 2009
Relevant to my Interests, Ep. 15
12 February 2009
07 February 2009
An Aside
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac226/ac226253cd8fe7afd7a97e17bd9237060f7872d1" alt=""
01 February 2009
Musical Interlude: Song of the Volga Boatmen
I've had this song stuck in my head the past few days (I had a lot of things stuck in my head the past few days, actually; this just happens to be among the least depressing of them). Here's the A. V. Alexandrov Russian Army Twice Red-bannered Academic Song and Dance Ensemble (more comfortably known as the Alexandrov Ensemble or the Red Army Choir) performing an excellent rendition of a classic Russian folk song. Be sure to watch it high quality for maximum effect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)